Via Don
            Box's Spoutlet, I read about Philip Greenspun’s take on how
            Java is the SUV of Programming Tools. I find it interesting for a number of reasons:
        
            1)      I’ve
            taught short courses at about 15 universities around the country, including MIT. There
            was a huge range of general competence amongst the undergrads I encountered. MIT had
            the best students I ran into, although Stanford and one or two others were also excellent.
            To hear Philip saying that the MIT students had a hard time with a technology does
            not bode well for its general applicability at other schools. You may want to take
            that with a grain of salt coming from me, though, because:
        
            2)      I
            went to MIT. :)
        
            3)      From
            the outside (of Java), Java looks almost exactly like C#/.NET to me – someone
            pointing out differences in productivity is a bit surprising.
        
            4)      This
            is far from the first time I’ve heard someone describe LISP as an advanced language.
            Given that I’ve been doing a bit of Emacs hacking lately, I might have to move
            really learning LISP well up on my TODO list.
        
             
        
No comments:
Post a Comment