tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2441850399540300710.post8583899445841103004..comments2024-02-17T03:47:06.818-08:00Comments on CraigBlog: HashSet&lt;T&gt; - Finally a Set Implementation in the .NET Class LibrariesCraig Anderahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17084199593129216563noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2441850399540300710.post-57252934882460047332007-09-26T05:31:00.000-07:002007-09-26T05:31:00.000-07:00Confirmed - it's a doc typo.Confirmed - it's a doc typo.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2441850399540300710.post-55223907562714339222007-09-26T05:08:00.000-07:002007-09-26T05:08:00.000-07:00For the life of me, I can't find it in 3.0 - I...For the life of me, I can't find it in 3.0 - I thought this was just a 3.5 addition? I realize the doc ref you gave says 3.0 ... but I think that's a typo :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2441850399540300710.post-13636999523499245982007-09-26T01:01:00.000-07:002007-09-26T01:01:00.000-07:00Documentation is here: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/...Documentation is here: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb359438(VS.90).aspxAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2441850399540300710.post-38458681177036939642007-09-26T00:28:00.000-07:002007-09-26T00:28:00.000-07:00Can you point me to the documentation please so we...Can you point me to the documentation please so we can get this fixed?<br /><br><br /><br>It is new in v3.5.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2441850399540300710.post-47712559183036620642007-09-25T07:25:00.000-07:002007-09-25T07:25:00.000-07:00Bah - fixed the "no duplicates" typo. Th...Bah - fixed the "no duplicates" typo. Thanks for pointing it out. <br /><br><br /><br>As far as 3.0 vs. 3.5, the documentation says it's in both. I haven't verified it. <br /><br><br /><br>Dave: I'm having a good time living my version of the REST lifestyle. I've wound up rolling my own framework but it has been pretty easy, and the obvious benefit is total control over what goes out on the wire. Xlinq has proven to be a pretty handy way of working with the content, too.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2441850399540300710.post-73791482040246370362007-09-25T06:21:00.000-07:002007-09-25T06:21:00.000-07:00Hey Craig,
I assume you meant "no duplicates...Hey Craig,<br /><br><br /><br>I assume you meant "no duplicates". I hope so.. cause if duplicates are allowed then I might have to go change some code.<br /><br><br /><br>Also, this has been in the fx since 3.5 not 3.0.<br /><br><br /><br>BTW, I love your REST thinking. I too am not digging WCF's "REST Support". It kind of feels like putting makeup on a sloth.<br /><br><br /><br>DaveAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2441850399540300710.post-43486971959263026922007-09-25T06:19:00.000-07:002007-09-25T06:19:00.000-07:00I think it is available only on .NET 3.5 and not o...I think it is available only on .NET 3.5 and not on .NET 3.0. Am I wrong?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com